Comparison · Customer Support
Decagon vs Tiledesk: which AI agent is better?
A side-by-side look at Decagon and Tiledesk on quality, price, capabilities and trust. Scores measure observable public data; prices come from each vendor's own pricing page. Every fact is sourced and dated.
| Decagon Decagon | Tiledesk Tiledesk | |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Score | 35 | 48 |
| Entry price | — | Free plan |
| Trust | ✓ VERIFIED | DECLARED |
| Capabilities documented | 6 | 6 |
| Free plan | No | ✓ Yes |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Public API | — | ✓ Yes |
| MCP support | — | ✓ Yes |
| Open source | No | ✓ Yes |
| Last verified | 24 Oct 2026 | — |
Score breakdown
| Component | Decagon | Tiledesk |
|---|---|---|
| Capabilities | 75 | 50 |
| Integrations | Not measured | 50 |
| Documentation | Not measured | Not measured |
| Pricing clarity | 40 | 100 |
| Transparency | 100 | 100 |
| Freshness | Not measured | Not measured |
| Human oversight | Not measured | Not measured |
Choose Decagon if…
On the measured criteria, Tiledesk leads — see opposite.
Choose Tiledesk if…
- You want a higher Agent Score (48 vs 35).
- You want a free plan to start.
- You want a free plan.
- You want an open-source option.
- You want a public API.
- You want MCP support.
See the full picture: Decagon · Tiledesk · more Customer Support agents · all comparisons.