Comparison · Coding
Amp vs Cursor: which AI agent is better?
A side-by-side look at Amp and Cursor on quality, price, capabilities and trust. Scores measure observable public data; prices come from each vendor's own pricing page. Every fact is sourced and dated.
| Amp Amp (Sourcegraph spin-out) | Cursor Anysphere | |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Score | 49 | 53 |
| Entry price | $20/mo · free plan | $20/mo · free plan |
| Trust | ✓ VERIFIED | ✓ VERIFIED |
| Capabilities documented | 4 | 4 |
| Free plan | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Public API | — | — |
| MCP support | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Open source | No | No |
| Last verified | 30 Sept 2026 | 30 Sept 2026 |
Score breakdown
| Component | Amp | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Capabilities | 38 | 50 |
| Integrations | 25 | 25 |
| Documentation | Not measured | Not measured |
| Pricing clarity | 100 | 100 |
| Transparency | 100 | 100 |
| Freshness | 100 | 100 |
| Human oversight | Not measured | Not measured |
Choose Amp if…
On the measured criteria, Cursor leads — see opposite.
Choose Cursor if…
- You want a higher Agent Score (53 vs 49).
See the full picture: Amp · Cursor · more Coding agents · all comparisons.