Comparison · Data
AgentQL vs Browser Use: which AI agent is better?
A side-by-side look at AgentQL and Browser Use on quality, price, capabilities and trust. Scores measure observable public data; prices come from each vendor's own pricing page. Every fact is sourced and dated.
| AgentQL TinyFish | Browser Use Browser Use | |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Score | 46 | 82 |
| Entry price | $99/mo · free plan | Free plan |
| Trust | ✓ VERIFIED | ✓ VERIFIED |
| Capabilities documented | 4 | 7 |
| Free plan | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Free trial | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Public API | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| MCP support | — | ✓ Yes |
| Open source | — | ✓ Yes |
| Last verified | 12 Oct 2026 | 13 Oct 2026 |
Score breakdown
| Component | AgentQL | Browser Use |
|---|---|---|
| Capabilities | 38 | 88 |
| Integrations | 25 | 50 |
| Documentation | Not measured | 100 |
| Pricing clarity | 100 | 100 |
| Transparency | 70 | 100 |
| Freshness | 100 | 100 |
| Human oversight | Not measured | Not measured |
Choose AgentQL if…
On the measured criteria, Browser Use leads — see opposite.
Choose Browser Use if…
- You want a higher Agent Score (82 vs 46).
- You want more documented capabilities (7 vs 4).
- You want an open-source option.
- You want MCP support.
See the full picture: AgentQL · Browser Use · more Data agents · all comparisons.